Jan 26, 2026
In the precision manufacturing sector of smart home appliances, the selection of the Sweeper Switch Button Spring directly determines the initial tactile experience and brand perceived quality. As the core interaction point of a Robot Vacuum Cleaner, the physical feedback of the power button is achieved through the mechanical characteristics of the spring. Currently, the two mainstream solutions in the industry are Linear Spring and Progressive Spring.
A Linear Spring is characterized by a constant Spring Rate throughout the entire compression stroke. According to Hooke's Law, the force is directly proportional to the displacement, where the rate remains a fixed constant.
When applying a linear spring to a sweeper power button, the resistance felt by the user's finger increases uniformly. The advantage of this design lies in its predictability. For sweeper brands that emphasize industrial aesthetics or minimalism, linear springs provide a steady and solid pressing feedback.
From a production perspective, the winding process for Linear Spring is highly mature. Controlling the Initial Tension is relatively easy, and during large-scale Fatigue Testing, the performance attenuation curve remains stable. This is beneficial for maintaining consistency across millions of activations.
A Progressive Spring (also known as a non-linear spring) changes its Spring Rate during compression by varying the wire diameter, pitch, or coil diameter. Typically, this results in a lighter touch at the beginning of the stroke, with resistance increasing rapidly as it nears the trigger point.
In high-end sweeper models, Progressive Spring technology is preferred for several reasons:
Tactile Feedback: It can simulate a "clicky" feel similar to mechanical keyboards. The user encounters low resistance initially, but as the Micro Switch trigger threshold is reached, the spring pressure rises sharply. This mechanical signal clearly informs the user that the command has been sent.
Preventing Accidental Touch: The high-resistance characteristic at the end of the progressive design effectively prevents the sweeper from accidental activation during transport or minor collisions.
The challenge lies in the extreme requirement for Wire Diameter consistency. If the heat treatment is uneven during production, it can easily lead to significant differences in button feel between different batches.
When designing for the specific scenario of a robot vacuum, engineers must balance several core parameters:
Regardless of the spring type, Pre-load is critical. Sweeper panels usually have a certain thickness and weight; the spring must provide enough support to prevent button rattling. Since a linear spring has a fixed rate, setting a high pre-load may lead to an overly heavy press later in the stroke. Conversely, a progressive spring can keep the button stable while maintaining a light initial stroke.
The power button stroke of a sweeper is usually between 0.5mm and 2.0mm. Within such a short stroke, the variable force characteristics of a Progressive Spring are harder to capture accurately. This places extreme demands on the processing precision of the Coiling Machine, such as servo control accuracy.
Sweepers generate vibration and may contact humid air during cleaning. Using Stainless Steel 301/304 or Music Wire ensures corrosion resistance. However, because progressive springs have unequal pitches, they are more prone to Squeak Noise if dust accumulates, requiring protective measures in the structural design.
| Feature | Linear Spring | Progressive Spring |
| Spring Rate | Constant | Variable/Increasing |
| User Feel | Smooth and Uniform | Tactile and Defined |
| Manufacturing Cost | Lower/Standard | Higher/Precision |
| Fatigue Life | Highly Predictable | Complex Analysis Required |
| Best Use Case | Standard/Economic Models | Flagship/Premium Models |